you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 74 points 4 months ago (23 children)

Kinda feel like both of these countries aren't going to be here much longer.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Israel yes, America no. The only way America wouldn't be here much longer is if a civil war happened (and even then it'd need to end in a stalemate), and there are simply no two sides with the guts to escalate things that far. MAGA and the rest of the far right have it in them to pull such a stunt if their grip on power is challenged, but would the center-left to center-right respond in kind? Absolutely not. Unfortunately America isn't going anywhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    MAGA goons are shooting people in the streets and running concentration camps for dissidents. What do you mean there’s no escalation?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago*

    So like I said, you need at least two sides willing to escalate things that far before a civil war breaks out. The right is absolutely willing to escalate as much as it needs to get its way, but who else is there? The combined center-right and center-left have done nothing but capitulate. They seem to have no intention to do anything but capitulate (and hold a few parades every year).

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -31 points 4 months ago (19 children)
  • [+] 50 points 4 months ago (10 children)
  • [+] -15 points 4 months ago* (9 children)
  • [+] 13 points 4 months ago (4 children)
  • [+] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)
  • This isn't really true internally for Russia. The USSR collapse was the result of the greed of the government officials who are now the Russian oligarchy (in collaboration with some Ukrainian officials IIRC who wanted to break away from the USSR?). The USSR didn't even have a stock market, and the "government" installed one for the specific purpose of allowing government officials to buy up major parts of the economy to become billionaires practically overnight while they caused a major economic recession to ensure that nobody else could profit from the short entry window because they were too busy selling off their heirlooms to buy bread. It's called Shock Therapy, and the Russians flew out at least one or two Wall Street execs in order to help them set the whole thing up. Modern Russia operates a lot like the US (at least economically).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    A US dissolution would be very different. The USSR had one country that dominated everything. When it broke apart, Russia alone still represented an overwhelming majority of the former Soviet block's population, economy, etc.

    That really isn't the case with the US. The largest state, California, only represents about 11% of the whole US population and a bit more on the economy. California would not dominate a post-dissolution US the way Russia dominated the former Soviet block. The big US states would be more the first among equals than the 800 lb gorilla in the room.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    You’re assuming that people act in their own interests. Conservatives will happily ruin their lives because an oligarch told them to. Just look at Brexit. Or…literally anything that happens in Republican states.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah I think a breakup of the US would result in several successor nations. The 50 wouldn't remain independent for long. But that does illustrate the key difference between this and the case of the USSR. It's likely that such successors would have a much more equal share of population and economy than the post-Soviet case.

    Though, another key difference is the history the US has for Constitutional conventions. Let's imagine the federal government goes away completely. By whatever means, 50 states are now independent nations. And as you note, after awhile most will get tired of being small tiny nations of little international clout. Now, one option would be the formation of new nations, perhaps formed from the regions of the old US. But there would also be folks running around calling for an entirely new Constitutional convention. Just a complete rewrite. And it is tempting to say that things are so contentious now that there's no chance the US could ever ratify a new Constitution. But, any Constitution would have to be adopted unanimously. This would be someone trying to get 50 independent states to merge. Each one individually could still say no. Which means that any new Constitution would be moderate and also structured with the kinds of grand bargains and compromises it took the original one to pass. If especially the new independent post-US states had some time to cool off, I can imagine after a few years a new movement to create a new Constitution would get going. There's already clear historical precedent for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    If the US falls apart, I would expect it to be a very bloody affair. Not just red state vs blue state, but also city blue against countryside red. The trauma of that would likely be sufficiently deep to keep folks apart for a couple of hundreds of years.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    People living there is irrelevant for the countries existing, people where living on land long before the concept of nations was invented and they may still after the concept of nations has faded in time.

    Or, you know more likely in the current climate: government false, power vacuum becomes violent power struggle and at the end a new nation is born with a fresh start to repeat the cycle of competitive imperialism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 4 months ago* (7 children)
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

    This is just some idea, not very much thought put in it yet but what if,

    Every US state became its own independent nation and the US tried to survive as a “EU” type of union.

    I suppose the union would fail as some states with more military resources may decide to wage war to control neighbouring resources. But the huge international power would be gone and divided in smaller powers.

    If it would survive as this type of union it shows that all the different states can work together as equals which is a better foundation then what there is now.

    Now if we also divide up russia and china this way at the same time we might actually solve a lot of international tensions at once.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 4 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Smaller countries don’t necessarily have better behaviour, its just their actions are less significant than major ones.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)