you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 48 points 4 months ago (5 children)

That's a weird way to phrase it given some of the data is still used today, for example with the frostbite information specifically.

But yes the US is made up of all the nazis and evil people they claimed to want to fight. Because they didn't really want to fight them, it was just the most profitable thing to do at the time.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    That data is not used anymore and you can't cite it or cite any paper that cite them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Out of sheer interest, is it because the data was discredited or is there an ethics issue that kills a paper once it's been cited?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    My understanding is there was little to no actual science in that data.

    To be science, the data would need to be systematic and care would need to be taken to exclude confounding factors. What that unit did doesn't become science simply because they made notes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment