you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 32 points 4 months ago (14 children)

It's so funny to watch all of these tech companies try to make Google glass again like the concept didn't fall flat on its face a decade ago.

Only a small handful of people are interested in the idea, and the general public hates them.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    They’re trying to create a new something. and there doesn’t seem to be another idea. The iPhone really only blew up the world because of the quality of its execution. The idea had been bouncing along for a long time. So every asshole thinks “we’ll just execute right and nail this thing.”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    The thought they have immediately before or after is also, "I'm the next Steve Jobs." It's always about the ego before any product or need.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Their situation is: they’re a tired social media site that is traded on the stock exchange and it’s just all downhill for them unless they change something big. They do want to be Steve Jobs, the guy who created a trillion dollar platform ecosystem, and they think hey we can use our social media site as one big ad for it to get things going. What else are you going to do with a tired social media property? You can at least fool some shareholders by telling them no, we have a whole new chapter about to begin. It’s a stupid game, I think driven more by market capitalism than personal ego, though of course there’s also plenty of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    Google Glass was like the 3rd time this tech has fallen on its face. I mentioned this before recently but I can remember when Sony had some that used a CD-ROM Walkman for the HUD data. They were going to be on the face of every engine mechanic by the end of the 90s…

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    For it to be desirable, the form factor needs to be indistinguishable from normal sunglasses or specs. With current technology it's not even close to being achievable. The battery tech just isn't there for starters. I have no idea why big tech thought this was just around the corner and thought just throwing money at an impossible problem would just make it possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago*

    You clearly don't understand. Google glasses didn't have Augmented reality.
    With these AR glasses you can have fluffy fur balls in different colors that jump around you everywhere you go.
    If that isn't worth $2200 to look like an idiot, IDK what is?

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -19 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    Hates? No. Not even near. Just cannot afford.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    No, people still like a lot of things that they can't afford. People hate these things because they are a privacy nightmare with minimal practical application.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Not true, lot's of people can easily afford these.
    And a shitload of people can if they really want them.
    The rest can pay over multiple years, in easy to afford monthly payments. /s
    Meaning the people that can't really afford them, can buy them anyway and pay twice the price with interest.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Would you daily wear them if they were giving this for free at an event?

    People is paying this kind of money to do an operation to remove glasses, then they introduce the "master of glasses", that weigh like 20 glasses

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Depends on the software part. If there will be freedom of compiling\installing arbitrary software then yes. I'm sure in this case it would be full of very interesting things in no time. But if it would be "fenced" like META does with their VR headsets, then those glasses would be almost useless.

  • source
  • parent