Twenty years ago, I met a couple with a young son who decided not to let the kid have sugar. I wonder how that might have worked out for the kid now that he's grown.

I assume the kid hit 18 and went on a sugar binge as soon as he tasted it the first time.

Anyone have experience with this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 48 points 4 months ago* (5 children)

I'm thinking there must be a study somewhere.

And indeed there is, where they studied people who were born just before and after the end of WW2 sugar rationing in the UK:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39480913/

Those people are into their 70s and 80s now, so the long term health outcomes are well documented:

...we found that early-life rationing reduced type 2 diabetes and hypertension risk by about 35 and 20% and delayed disease onset by 4 and 2 years, respectively. Protection was evident with in utero exposure and increased with postnatal sugar restriction, especially after 6 months, when eating of solid foods likely began. In utero sugar rationing alone accounted for about one-third of the risk reduction.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Thank you. I know I shouldn't be surprised this doesn't have more than 10% of the upvotes for anecdotal "I didn't get sugar when I was a kid, so my adult onset diabetes and obesity is clearly my parents fault." But, I'm a little disappointed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    But, it's not really what I asked. I asked for experience, not studies. I like the anecdotes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments