â–² 281 â–¼ just wasn' 'avin it, simple as (feddit.uk) submitted 4 months ago by flamingos@feddit.uk to c/okmatewanker@feddit.uk 104 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 4 months ago (9 children) Man's justified permalink fedilink source hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 months ago Sometimes I think guys just aren't aware that you can't just kill things for stealing your chip permalink fedilink source parent [–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago (7 children) Weird day on Lemmy when animal murder is being celebrated. Killing animals (without eating them) is serial killer shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 4 months ago Eh, factory farming is messed up too even if you eat the bodies. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 5 points 4 months ago How do you know he didn’t eat it? permalink fedilink source parent [–] harmbugler@piefed.social 2 points 4 months ago I always did think hippos had a serial killer quality permalink fedilink source parent [–] pilferjinx@piefed.social 1 point 4 months ago (2 children) If any animal fucks around, they have to expect to find out. Feels like a golden rule situation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child) this community's mod officially approves of bigotry against people for their gender so I'm removing this comments content permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pilferjinx@piefed.social 1 point 4 months ago It would depend on the situation I think. We just have a story to go on here and no direct awareness of the events as they unfolded. In your scenarios there's a different degree and intent in actions and reactions. But if I had to put down some general morality I would probably settle on equal, non excessive, reactions to establish personal boundaries. This entirely depends on the individual subjects though. One could have neurological or intellectual disorders for example. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago You haven’t had to deal with seagulls and it shows. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 months ago Sometimes I think guys just aren't aware that you can't just kill things for stealing your chip permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago (7 children) Weird day on Lemmy when animal murder is being celebrated. Killing animals (without eating them) is serial killer shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 4 months ago Eh, factory farming is messed up too even if you eat the bodies. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 5 points 4 months ago How do you know he didn’t eat it? permalink fedilink source parent [–] harmbugler@piefed.social 2 points 4 months ago I always did think hippos had a serial killer quality permalink fedilink source parent [–] pilferjinx@piefed.social 1 point 4 months ago (2 children) If any animal fucks around, they have to expect to find out. Feels like a golden rule situation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child) this community's mod officially approves of bigotry against people for their gender so I'm removing this comments content permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pilferjinx@piefed.social 1 point 4 months ago It would depend on the situation I think. We just have a story to go on here and no direct awareness of the events as they unfolded. In your scenarios there's a different degree and intent in actions and reactions. But if I had to put down some general morality I would probably settle on equal, non excessive, reactions to establish personal boundaries. This entirely depends on the individual subjects though. One could have neurological or intellectual disorders for example. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago You haven’t had to deal with seagulls and it shows. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 4 months ago Eh, factory farming is messed up too even if you eat the bodies. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 5 points 4 months ago How do you know he didn’t eat it? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 2 points 4 months ago I always did think hippos had a serial killer quality permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pilferjinx@piefed.social 1 point 4 months ago (2 children) If any animal fucks around, they have to expect to find out. Feels like a golden rule situation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child) this community's mod officially approves of bigotry against people for their gender so I'm removing this comments content permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pilferjinx@piefed.social 1 point 4 months ago It would depend on the situation I think. We just have a story to go on here and no direct awareness of the events as they unfolded. In your scenarios there's a different degree and intent in actions and reactions. But if I had to put down some general morality I would probably settle on equal, non excessive, reactions to establish personal boundaries. This entirely depends on the individual subjects though. One could have neurological or intellectual disorders for example. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child) this community's mod officially approves of bigotry against people for their gender so I'm removing this comments content permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pilferjinx@piefed.social 1 point 4 months ago It would depend on the situation I think. We just have a story to go on here and no direct awareness of the events as they unfolded. In your scenarios there's a different degree and intent in actions and reactions. But if I had to put down some general morality I would probably settle on equal, non excessive, reactions to establish personal boundaries. This entirely depends on the individual subjects though. One could have neurological or intellectual disorders for example. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pilferjinx@piefed.social 1 point 4 months ago It would depend on the situation I think. We just have a story to go on here and no direct awareness of the events as they unfolded. In your scenarios there's a different degree and intent in actions and reactions. But if I had to put down some general morality I would probably settle on equal, non excessive, reactions to establish personal boundaries. This entirely depends on the individual subjects though. One could have neurological or intellectual disorders for example. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago You haven’t had to deal with seagulls and it shows. permalink fedilink source parent