you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If we're so tight on funds, maybe we shouldn't be hiring so many new Congress people?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    tight on funds

    Things are better in other countries, but this particular lie is almost universal, as are the "solutions": bashing minorities & slashing funding for social services to keep the gen pop entertained, while the money flows to projects rich people benefit from.

    The article's topic is more ideological though; the Trump admin's continued efforts to eliminate anything LGBTQ+.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    New senators and representatives are slightly cheaper than the existing ones, although with a fixed size of 100 and 435 it's not highly variable.

    And fixing the house at the size it was a century ago when the country was a third its current population contributed to the house.not being responsive.

  • source
  • parent