▲ 428 ▼ 400+ Arch Linux AUR Packages Compromised in a Supply Chain Attack Deploying Infostealers (cybersecuritynews.com) submitted 5 months ago by rafssunny@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world 123 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 5 months ago (7 children) I wish Arch packages as much in their repos as Debian. permalink fedilink source hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago* (6 children) I think there was a word missing. To respond to what I think you were saying, this event happened in the Arch User Repository, and not the official repositories. Arch is very clear that they are not responsible for what goes on in the AUR. For example on https://aur.archlinux.org/ : DISCLAIMER: AUR packages are user produced content. Any use of the provided files is at your own risk. The Debian equivalent would be somewhere between extrepo and PPAs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago (4 children) I think the comment makes sense, if more packages were supported on the main Arch repos there would be less of a need to use the AUR or Flatpaks. There are definitely some big gaps on the Arch repos (web browsers in particular) that I would like to see improved. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 1 point 5 months ago (2 children) You're right, but web browsers can be pretty brutal to build and they are for sure never going to add -bin versions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) I don't understand this argument. Isn't it better to build once and distribute binaries than to make everyone compile it themselves? The vast majority of AUR packages I use are -bin versions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago You don't get to see the code that way, which is where bad actors thrive. Also it wasn't compiled for exactly your system. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 4 points 5 months ago maybe i went offtopic but i was comparing the AUR To Debian's repos, i see that Debian has more packages in its repos(things like Llama-CPP and Open arena is in debian but arch needs the AUR) thats what i meant permalink fedilink source parent
[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago* (6 children) I think there was a word missing. To respond to what I think you were saying, this event happened in the Arch User Repository, and not the official repositories. Arch is very clear that they are not responsible for what goes on in the AUR. For example on https://aur.archlinux.org/ : DISCLAIMER: AUR packages are user produced content. Any use of the provided files is at your own risk. The Debian equivalent would be somewhere between extrepo and PPAs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago (4 children) I think the comment makes sense, if more packages were supported on the main Arch repos there would be less of a need to use the AUR or Flatpaks. There are definitely some big gaps on the Arch repos (web browsers in particular) that I would like to see improved. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 1 point 5 months ago (2 children) You're right, but web browsers can be pretty brutal to build and they are for sure never going to add -bin versions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) I don't understand this argument. Isn't it better to build once and distribute binaries than to make everyone compile it themselves? The vast majority of AUR packages I use are -bin versions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago You don't get to see the code that way, which is where bad actors thrive. Also it wasn't compiled for exactly your system. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 4 points 5 months ago maybe i went offtopic but i was comparing the AUR To Debian's repos, i see that Debian has more packages in its repos(things like Llama-CPP and Open arena is in debian but arch needs the AUR) thats what i meant permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago (4 children) I think the comment makes sense, if more packages were supported on the main Arch repos there would be less of a need to use the AUR or Flatpaks. There are definitely some big gaps on the Arch repos (web browsers in particular) that I would like to see improved. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 1 point 5 months ago (2 children) You're right, but web browsers can be pretty brutal to build and they are for sure never going to add -bin versions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) I don't understand this argument. Isn't it better to build once and distribute binaries than to make everyone compile it themselves? The vast majority of AUR packages I use are -bin versions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago You don't get to see the code that way, which is where bad actors thrive. Also it wasn't compiled for exactly your system. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 1 point 5 months ago (2 children) You're right, but web browsers can be pretty brutal to build and they are for sure never going to add -bin versions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) I don't understand this argument. Isn't it better to build once and distribute binaries than to make everyone compile it themselves? The vast majority of AUR packages I use are -bin versions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago You don't get to see the code that way, which is where bad actors thrive. Also it wasn't compiled for exactly your system. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) I don't understand this argument. Isn't it better to build once and distribute binaries than to make everyone compile it themselves? The vast majority of AUR packages I use are -bin versions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago You don't get to see the code that way, which is where bad actors thrive. Also it wasn't compiled for exactly your system. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago You don't get to see the code that way, which is where bad actors thrive. Also it wasn't compiled for exactly your system. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 4 points 5 months ago maybe i went offtopic but i was comparing the AUR To Debian's repos, i see that Debian has more packages in its repos(things like Llama-CPP and Open arena is in debian but arch needs the AUR) thats what i meant permalink fedilink source parent