▲ 523 ▼ URGENT: We’re one bad D.C. deal away from the era of online government censorship. (www.fire.org) submitted 5 months ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world 100 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (6 children) No it isn't. It's about Reddit. Read up the chain. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (5 children) Yeah Reddit the private US company that is not beholden to preserving your free speech. That's the context. Are you functionally illiterate and cannot infer the meaning unless explicitly stated? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (4 children) Not legally beholden. You realize that speech can be free or not outside of the context of the Constitution, yes? Like "free" and "speech" are just common nouns that can be used in other ways. You dumb motherfucker. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Soggy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (3 children) Can be. Isn't in this context though, it's about reddit having the legal right to ban your account. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (2 children) Re-read the entire chain, their legal right to do it was only mentioned in your head permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Soggy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) Ooh, you mean this part? slow your roll. getting kicked off Reddit, a private entity, is not a violation of your free speech. having FBI agents show up at your door asking threatening questions about your Reddit history is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Aaaandd we're back to the whole "concept vs. legality" thing. Talk in circles by yourself, I'm out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (5 children) Yeah Reddit the private US company that is not beholden to preserving your free speech. That's the context. Are you functionally illiterate and cannot infer the meaning unless explicitly stated? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (4 children) Not legally beholden. You realize that speech can be free or not outside of the context of the Constitution, yes? Like "free" and "speech" are just common nouns that can be used in other ways. You dumb motherfucker. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Soggy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (3 children) Can be. Isn't in this context though, it's about reddit having the legal right to ban your account. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (2 children) Re-read the entire chain, their legal right to do it was only mentioned in your head permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Soggy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) Ooh, you mean this part? slow your roll. getting kicked off Reddit, a private entity, is not a violation of your free speech. having FBI agents show up at your door asking threatening questions about your Reddit history is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Aaaandd we're back to the whole "concept vs. legality" thing. Talk in circles by yourself, I'm out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (4 children) Not legally beholden. You realize that speech can be free or not outside of the context of the Constitution, yes? Like "free" and "speech" are just common nouns that can be used in other ways. You dumb motherfucker. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Soggy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (3 children) Can be. Isn't in this context though, it's about reddit having the legal right to ban your account. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (2 children) Re-read the entire chain, their legal right to do it was only mentioned in your head permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Soggy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) Ooh, you mean this part? slow your roll. getting kicked off Reddit, a private entity, is not a violation of your free speech. having FBI agents show up at your door asking threatening questions about your Reddit history is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Aaaandd we're back to the whole "concept vs. legality" thing. Talk in circles by yourself, I'm out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (3 children) Can be. Isn't in this context though, it's about reddit having the legal right to ban your account. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (2 children) Re-read the entire chain, their legal right to do it was only mentioned in your head permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Soggy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) Ooh, you mean this part? slow your roll. getting kicked off Reddit, a private entity, is not a violation of your free speech. having FBI agents show up at your door asking threatening questions about your Reddit history is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Aaaandd we're back to the whole "concept vs. legality" thing. Talk in circles by yourself, I'm out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (2 children) Re-read the entire chain, their legal right to do it was only mentioned in your head permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Soggy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) Ooh, you mean this part? slow your roll. getting kicked off Reddit, a private entity, is not a violation of your free speech. having FBI agents show up at your door asking threatening questions about your Reddit history is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Aaaandd we're back to the whole "concept vs. legality" thing. Talk in circles by yourself, I'm out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) Ooh, you mean this part? slow your roll. getting kicked off Reddit, a private entity, is not a violation of your free speech. having FBI agents show up at your door asking threatening questions about your Reddit history is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Aaaandd we're back to the whole "concept vs. legality" thing. Talk in circles by yourself, I'm out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Aaaandd we're back to the whole "concept vs. legality" thing. Talk in circles by yourself, I'm out. permalink fedilink source parent