you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)

According to Wikipedia, nothing distinguishes a totenkopf from other skull symbols, with or without bones behind it. Poison symbol? Totenkopf. Punisher logo? Totenkopf. Skull with a bullet hole in it? Believe it or not, totenkopf.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    This is so fucking disingenuous.

    Might want to think about taking a step back and considering why you're defending Nazi symbology

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Go read the Wikipedia page. It's silly.

    I have no idea if it's a realistic depiction of what qualifies or not, but practically any skull used in a vaguely militaristic context qualifies under its description.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago

    Then wow it must just be a crazy coincidence that the tattoo he got on his chest is the exact design that Wikipedia (and pretty much every other site about Nazi symbology) chose to show as an example.

    What bad luck! 🙄

  • source
  • parent