you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

While I get the intention, I don't think this is something they are going to be able to enforce. How will they know these items were sent and not bought because they rarely will say when something has been sent to them, and often pretend they bought it themselves to make it seem more authentic. The CRA still doesn't truly understand the industry, which is why they will continue to get away with stuff. One of my jobs is self-employed freelance writing, which has been around forever, and I don't know how many times I have to try to explain what I do to a CRA agent during tax season, and they still never truly understand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

    Apparently, the CRA is using AI and looking into top, mega-influencers. #gifted is also a dead giveaway.

    In other news, Mikayla Nogueira is having trouble with the FTC. Look at the warnings on her posts. I wonder if Birdie worries about this stuff? She should!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments