you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 5 months ago (10 children)

Can you elaborate on

maybe surprisingly to you

?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 5 months ago (9 children)

    You’re the one defending the sexist comment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] 17 points 5 months ago (9 children)
  • [+] -11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I genuinely do not read where they are doing what you're saying they're doing. All they said was someone laying down and not putting effort into sex may have a history of trauma. Meanwhile, you and the other fella kinda were ridiculing people who do that...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I'm going to copy my original comment:

    Not for nothing, but the tendency for people who get along purely by being conventionally attractive to starfish isn't like, a secret. Lack of effort isn't really a gendered thing.

    Where I very specifically narrow it down to vapid people who are in it for self-pleasure as opposed to mutual enjoyment.

    The acrobatic inception of the idea that we're talking about people reliving trauma instead of just being emotionally checked out like the entire previous thread implied is what I take issue with, it's some legitimately heinous fake ally shit to use that as a non-sequiter argument.

    And yes, implying that I or the guy before me continued on through a partner reliving trauma IS nonconsent which IS rape. You can't imply one without implying the other.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -17 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Being nasty about women laying back and only offering their vaginas is worse than anything I’ve said.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    So you think that's the level of effort a woman is supposed to put in, because she's a woman and thus can't be responsible for her actions? That's incredibly sexist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

    Nah I think you’re nasty about women because you’re a pathetic man who can’t take accountability for his own actions.

    And you’re transphobic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, didn't say anything about trans at all. You wanted to be offended, so you made up an offence. Well done, you now are offended.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)