613
This shit will kill people. (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago by to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
107 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Yes, I'll just trust the AI to help me fuck around with grid voltage levels.

With google search results becoming so poor, I guess I need to look into kagi or duck-duck. Pain in my dick, motherless goatfucking, horsehit-happy asshole, corporate varmints gotta fuck it all up for more profit. I'm tired, yo.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 38 points 5 months ago (7 children)

You have no idea what you're talking about and you'd feel a lot better if you could just accept that. This story you are telling is absolutely nonsense fantasy, stitched together from a bunch of different actual things to create a narrative that tells a completely untrue and fantastical story

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Why do you have the exact number of upvotes that the person you're replying to has downvotes. Seems like an unlikely coincidence. Also weird how you don't actually address anything in the comment. Almost like some bot brigade.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    if someone tells you some computer data can't be represented in hexadecimal codes, that's a clear sign they don't even know how computers work, let alone LLM. its also futile to compare the LLM internal representation of data to programming languages, its like comparing birdsong to building blueprints.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] -12 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    Wrong. Here’s one of the papers on the research. "Do Sparse Autoencoders Capture Concept Manifolds?"

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.28119

    and a video on the paper

    https://youtu.be/_G1NBI3AW5Q

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 39 points 5 months ago

    Your writing shows that you have no idea how to interpret this paper at all. You clearly have no historical concept of the development of machine learning, neural networks, and the fundamentals of the domain. You are trying to read a cutting edge paper that relies heavily on the reader having deep domain expertise. The video you linked is ALSO not for laypersons as it doesn't actually explain the basics of the domain. You can't just dive into the deep end of a pool without knowing how to swim and then tell everyone you were lost at sea.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent