you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Direct link to the study: https://www.psycnet.org/doi/10.1037/ppm0000672

Unfortunately, its paywalled, but I'd be curious about the methodology and population.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago*

    Well it was posted about by psypost which is dogshit and constantly spams headlines like this based off studies with n=25 chinese teenagers, online survey

    But then psypost writes a 50 paragraph "blog" post about it like its gospel and never mentions these insane limitations, and almost everybody happily accepts these posts because the headline meets se confirmation bias if theirs, or an expected one at least, then sprints to the comments to blather on and on about it, never even reading the original crappy study

    Its all really unscientific but masquerades as scientific fact

    I despise psypost and think it should be banned

    We cant even verify the methodology or sample size of this one but look at all the commenters in this thread who have seemingly accepted it as valid science

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    If anyone ends up getting access, I would also be interested in the study.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    If you ping me tomorrow, I'll be happy to send it to you when I'm at my computer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments