From the policy in the PR:

The policy's guidelines are roughly as follows:

It's fine to use LLMs to answer questions, analyze, distill, refine, check, suggest, review. But not to create.

LLMs work best when used as a tool to write better, not faster.

We carve out a space for "experimentation" to inform future revisions to this policy.

So... No, it isn't.

Note that there are times when using a LLM to create code is allowed. Reading the doc explains the nuance.

Actual programmers using it as a proper tool should produce output indistinguishable from actual programmers not using it at all. That there even is (often) a visible distinction is a big part of the problem.

Notably, it even explicitly says in the proposal that it shouldn't require any policing. Instead, obvious cases are more important.

Yeah, that totally makes sense.