you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -8 points 5 months ago (8 children)

If my analysis was so off you could have just said "so say does not sound skeptical to me" or "seemingly is a perfectly neutral word

This is exactly what I'm talking about when I say you have a razor thin standard in your head. I did say both of those things, but because I didn't use the exact phrasing you imagine in your head, you can't recognize it. Kinda like how koalas can't recognize eucalyptus leaves sitting on a table.

You need to recognize that the world doesn't live inside your head. Strangers don't know the exact wording that will activate your neurons. When you learn to interact with slightly different perspectives and utilize context clues and critical thinking to parse the things other people say, you will become a much more persuasive and competing debater.

But right now, you come off like a koala that can't recognize eucalyptus leaves because they aren't on the branch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    Let me get this straight. You called me out for ignoring a distinction you made, and I quoted your exact words to show I did not ignore them, I just disagreed with your infantile framing of them. And now your response is that I have a "razor thin standard" and that I cannot recognize arguments unless they use exact phrasing. But you literally just complained that I did not address a specific point you made. So which is it? Do I need to address your exact words or do I need to read between the lines like a psychic?

    Also the koala metaphor is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. You are comparing me to an animal that cannot recognize food sitting right in front of it. But the entire conversation has been me pointing to specific words on the screen and you saying you are reading too much into it. If anyone is missing what is right in front of them, it is the person who thinks "so say" is neutral phrasing and "crazily dense tangle" is a compliment.

    And competing debater? That is not a thing. The word is competent. Irony levels are off the charts here. 🤣

    But please. Keep calling me a koala. It really sells the I have run out of actual arguments energy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    do I need to read between the lines like a psychic?

    Exactly my point. It didn't seem so difficult when you were projecting bias onto the author of the article.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    when you definitely understand what words projecting and bias mean

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 5 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] [S] 6 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    the fact that you genuinely think that is what makes the whole thing genuinely hilarious

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    The fact that you've done nothing but double down on bad takes is what validates your reputation outside your bubble. Inaccurate and unproductive projection.

    I hope you mature one day. This attitude is why the left isn't taken seriously, and I'd prefer if that changed.

    Have the day you deserve 👍

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments