you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 138 points 1 year ago (25 children)

While this is alarming, it seems like such an obvious attempt to distract us from the people in Texas who died from the Republican party's inaction. As well as the revelation that the Epstein suicide video was edited

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (21 children)

    Wait is there proof of that now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 1 year ago (18 children)

    Well there's and entire minute missing, and the video was released with Adobe Premiere metadata....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (17 children)

    I read that wasn’t even epsteins cell

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (16 children)

    The video shows a totally different cell than the original news pictures yeah.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    So what was the point of it? And why does it matter if was edited?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It matters because that missing minute is when he actually died. One minute he's alive, the next he's dead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I mean if it’s not even his cell, what’s the point of the video

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The usual: buffoonish attempts at distraction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    I completely agree. My confusion is with the people who are being critical of the coverup still seem to be missing the point that the video is irrelevant in the first place.

    The video may as well have been of Disney world. I don’t know why anyone cares about the edit and I don’t believe all the people talking about the edit are complicit in the coverup.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Ah the only explanation is you're on the video killing Epstein. Have fun in prison why does the truth matter?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    I’m saying if the video isn’t even of his cell, what’s the point of the video and if it’s edit? Who cares about some random cell?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    You can’t be that fucking oblivious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

    I think you’re not understanding what I’m saying. You’re rhetoric is ironic.

    In case you’ve been in a box, no one is really talking about this point. They are more concerned about the video being edited rather than completely irrelevant.

    The point I am making, which seems to be difficult for people to interpret even they they are calling me stupid, is if the video isn’t even irrelevant why does any even care that it is edited. And secondly, why is there no articles pointing out how misleading the video is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    What rhetoric?

    I think you’re not understanding a blatant attempt at an obvious cover-up. It matters because we are being openly lied to by the government.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Are you that fucking oblivious to your own rhetoric? You just said

    you can’t be that fucking oblivious

    It’s obvious it’s a cover up. The assessment of the coverup is confusing. I’ve already stated why I find other people’s assessment of the coverup confusing. I shouldn’t have to repeat it again while being called oblivious

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You don't know what rhetoric means.

    And apparently, yeah, you are that oblivious. It’s not that confusing, like, at all. Politicians are lying and making shit up because most of them are on Epstein’s list of clients.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    If it's a legitimate threat, it's not a distraction. It's called "flooding the zone" and it's intentional, but it's mean to overwhelm us in general with the sheer amount of bullshit he spews.

    But don't make the mistake that this is a distraction. He's opening a path to strip anyone he dislikes of citizenship and exile them to a foreign death camp. This is deadly serious and should not be ignored.

  • source
  • parent