▲ 395 ▼ 8 Democrats Help Pass GOP Bill Forcing Teachers To Out Transgender Students (www.huffpost.com) submitted 5 months ago by Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world 113 comments fedilink hide all child comments Henry Cuellar, Donald Davis, Cleo Fields, Laura Gillen, Vicente Gonzalez, Marcy Kaptur, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, and Eugene Vindman
[–] zoloftt@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago (6 children) Because most people know what a rhetorical question is? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (5 children) Maybe you should look it up then. Because, if you answer it for them, it's not really rhetorical, is it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] zoloftt@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago (4 children) I think you missed the part where I framed it as if I was having a conversation with the person? You're clearly angry about my choice of literary devices. Sorry to upset you. Have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children) No, that part was very apparent. You having a make believe conversation where you spoke for the other person is the source of our entire conversation. It's not a literary device, though, is the problem. Also, as long as we're talking about literary devices immediately trying to frame anyone who disagrees with you as "angry" is a classic. Not a device from any respectable literature though of course. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] zoloftt@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago* (2 children) ](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literary_device) You dropped these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 child) I hope one day you'll be to actually comprehend that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zoloftt@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago Me too, thanks! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (5 children) Maybe you should look it up then. Because, if you answer it for them, it's not really rhetorical, is it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] zoloftt@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago (4 children) I think you missed the part where I framed it as if I was having a conversation with the person? You're clearly angry about my choice of literary devices. Sorry to upset you. Have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children) No, that part was very apparent. You having a make believe conversation where you spoke for the other person is the source of our entire conversation. It's not a literary device, though, is the problem. Also, as long as we're talking about literary devices immediately trying to frame anyone who disagrees with you as "angry" is a classic. Not a device from any respectable literature though of course. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] zoloftt@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago* (2 children) ](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literary_device) You dropped these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 child) I hope one day you'll be to actually comprehend that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zoloftt@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago Me too, thanks! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zoloftt@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago (4 children) I think you missed the part where I framed it as if I was having a conversation with the person? You're clearly angry about my choice of literary devices. Sorry to upset you. Have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children) No, that part was very apparent. You having a make believe conversation where you spoke for the other person is the source of our entire conversation. It's not a literary device, though, is the problem. Also, as long as we're talking about literary devices immediately trying to frame anyone who disagrees with you as "angry" is a classic. Not a device from any respectable literature though of course. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] zoloftt@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago* (2 children) ](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literary_device) You dropped these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 child) I hope one day you'll be to actually comprehend that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zoloftt@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago Me too, thanks! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children) No, that part was very apparent. You having a make believe conversation where you spoke for the other person is the source of our entire conversation. It's not a literary device, though, is the problem. Also, as long as we're talking about literary devices immediately trying to frame anyone who disagrees with you as "angry" is a classic. Not a device from any respectable literature though of course. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] zoloftt@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago* (2 children) ](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literary_device) You dropped these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 child) I hope one day you'll be to actually comprehend that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zoloftt@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago Me too, thanks! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zoloftt@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago* (2 children) ](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literary_device) You dropped these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 child) I hope one day you'll be to actually comprehend that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zoloftt@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago Me too, thanks! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 child) I hope one day you'll be to actually comprehend that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zoloftt@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago Me too, thanks! permalink fedilink source parent