That's the thing, he has been proven guilty. Loads of testimonies and more.

It's just that the broken american justice system hasn't yet convicted him.

Alright then... Supreme Court docket

2. Mr. Trump sexually abused Ms. Carroll? YES X NO____

Here's some Wikipedia reading

Verdict and aftermath (January 2024–present) edit

On January 26, 2024, the jury deliberated for three hours and awarded Carroll $7.3 million in emotional damages, $11 million in reputation-related damages, and $65 million in punitive damages, totaling $83.3 million.[246] The jury found Trump had committed sexual abuse and forcible touching, two of the three elements of Carroll's battery claim.[248] Trump said he would appeal.[249]

And let's not forget this classic gem

You know I'm automatically attracted to beautiful—I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star, they let you do it, you can do anything ... grab them by the pussy.

The question wasn't about proof.

It's more like: If a guy is known for shitting his pants and it smells like shit when he's around, are you going to require proof of shit in his pants before you deny him sitting in your brand new couch?

In the eye of the law, yes. Public opinion is allowed to be different. But you have one good point. The text does not mention how they are stalling and hindering the investigations despite their promise to open the files.

Only works if you have a functional and fair justice system (which you don't).