kayzeekayzee comments on Lossless Scaling's Frame Generation for Linux gets upgraded to the latest v3.1

PC Gaming

15,872 readers

5,821 active

864 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago

moderators

[–] kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No, it has way more options and scaling types thatn gamescope. Also it can do pretty good framegen. I use it all the time.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] ampy@discuss.online 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

Not a fan of framegen personally. I've been fine with just gamescope since they added the pixel art scaling. I haven't really had a need for any other type of scaling filter in my experience.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

Framegen has to be used on a game where I have 30-40fps.

If I have 29fps, my character lags like they're drunk.

If I have 50+fps, I don't need framegen.

Cyberpunk 2077 is the only game I use it on.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago

That's fair. I mostly use framegen to get from 40-60 fps in games. You stop seeing the artifacts pretty quickly, even with something like Losseless Scaling, which doesn't have access to internal game data like a native implementation would.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent