PC Gaming

pcgaming@lemmy.ca

15,872 readers

5,821 active

864 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca

UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Lossless Scaling's Frame Generation for Linux gets upgraded to the latest v3.1 (www.gamingonlinux.com)

submitted 1 year ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ampy@discuss.online 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

Not a fan of framegen personally. I've been fine with just gamescope since they added the pixel art scaling. I haven't really had a need for any other type of scaling filter in my experience.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

Framegen has to be used on a game where I have 30-40fps.

If I have 29fps, my character lags like they're drunk.

If I have 50+fps, I don't need framegen.

Cyberpunk 2077 is the only game I use it on.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago

That's fair. I mostly use framegen to get from 40-60 fps in games. You stop seeing the artifacts pretty quickly, even with something like Losseless Scaling, which doesn't have access to internal game data like a native implementation would.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent