you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 5 months ago (20 children)

No it's not. It's a whole bunch of loosely correlated characteristics, many of which can be changed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 5 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (9 children)

    Colin M. Wright, the author of the book you linked, is an "anti-transgender activist". Here is a nice collection of his bigotry.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 5 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    Reality isn’t transphobic, but that guy definitely is.

    Also I’m not discussing sex in humans with you again. I and many people, who’re are way more knowledgeable, have wasted hours of their life doing that. Much less under a post about a stupid bathroom law.


    PS: I’m sooo sorry that I said that the piece of written work you linked to was a book.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 5 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    I'm not sorry that I pointed out that that guy is a transphobe, but I am sorry that I engaged with you again.

    I’m going to block you now. Originally I wanted to discuss Imane Khelif, when new concrete information was available, but now I am going to block you for my own sake. @davidagain@lemmy.world can discuss with you until both of your keyboards break.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago* (5 children)

    Hehe. Powerstruggle is one of the most persistent transphobic conversation derailers on lemmy. They show up in any post related to trans people to discuss their pet transphobic theories, often one which Trump gave. Imagine being intellectuality dominated by Donald Trump!

    I completely understand you blocking them. If I were the mod of a news sub where they repeatedly behaved the way they do, I would wield the ban hammer hard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Also spamming the same comments word for word all over the thread.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    You're all over spamming transphobic bullshit. You're here in bad faith to push a culture war agenda because you're a fucking bigot. Fuck off. Nothing you've posted here has been at all relevant, you're a bigot posting junk science to push gender essentialism. You're a bigot. You're a transphobic bigot piece of shit now go fuck yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [+] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    Stop lying

    Lol! I said you always do it, then you did it! You have an amazing ability to hold two contradictory ideas at the same time.

    They show up in any post related to trans people to discuss their pet transphobic theories, often one which Trump gave.

    And there's your pet theory that just happens to have been copied from the imbecile pedophile in chief!

    Do you propose that we inspect someone's gametes to gain access to public toilets?! 10/10 irrelevant point.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [+] -7 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    The thread of this conversation is exactly why a line has to be drawn and written in law using the clearest measure there is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    A) No it doesn't. Where I live, it is entirely legal for a man to enter the women's bathroom. Nothing to do with transgender folks; it simply is not a crime.

    B) The UK has an official "gender recognition certificate" program. If you wanted to draw a line, I would think that individuals with such a certificate would fall on their recognized side of the line; however, under the new standard, a trans women with an official government issued gender recognition certificate is still considered by that same government to be a man for the purposes of using a toilet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Oooor just let trans folk use the damn bathroom? There doesn't need to have a line drawn

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

    Clearest measure here wouldn't be the "biological sex" anyway... Because going mens bathroom doesn't require a penis, last time I checked. But it does require to be perceived as a man which relates more to other characteristics like beard and appearance. Same goes the other way around.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    And how do you define something as subjective as that in law? Absolutely absurd.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    That’s the great thing… you don’t. They are trying to solve a problem that doesn’t exist. There are already laws in place which forbid harassment. There is absolutely no need to create a law which can’t be enforced anyway and is most likely causing more trouble (for cis people too!) than just keeping things like they were.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)