you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Clearest measure here wouldn't be the "biological sex" anyway... Because going mens bathroom doesn't require a penis, last time I checked. But it does require to be perceived as a man which relates more to other characteristics like beard and appearance. Same goes the other way around.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    And how do you define something as subjective as that in law? Absolutely absurd.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    That’s the great thing… you don’t. They are trying to solve a problem that doesn’t exist. There are already laws in place which forbid harassment. There is absolutely no need to create a law which can’t be enforced anyway and is most likely causing more trouble (for cis people too!) than just keeping things like they were.

  • source
  • parent