you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 5 months ago* (5 children)

Sometimes I wonder if humans just "evolved" better painting skills. I mean people back then surely must have realised that their painting looks nothing like an actual cat. So either they were told specifically to paint a cat with a human face or they were really bad at their job.
Same goes for older works. Egyptian paintings lacked depth and had that weird legs-torso rotation. Like maybe our brains just got better at conceptualising perspective and stuff.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago*

    We now have access to a staggering amount of art.

    In, say, the Middle Ages, few people owned illustrated books, even fewer owned art like paintings. Many never left their own small town, so if you weren't in Rome et al you were on your own artistically. Things can get weird (like these cats).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    There were amazing sculpters and artists, but I think anyone with talent had a rare chance of being born rich and honing that skill set. So maybe these were just the palace's beat artist on hand? The human faces are just weird though. There must have been a reason

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    I want to say that's it's moreso just a case of technique ever-improving. Also a case of a certain art style being en vogue and normalised, suggesting that a more physically accurate-looking cat might have been less welcome or expected than the style of the day.

    You can add "expression" to that second point, also.

  • source
  • parent