you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I'm not tying to restrict you from using stuff that helps bypass disability.

I'm trying to have more-likely-to-kill-someone behaviors more-licensed.

Ignore that distinction if your ideology wants..

_ /\ _

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    No, what you're doing is tying people's speed to what their specific body can produce rather than what is safe. Those are two very different things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Not what I meant:

    I'm tying power to the power that the bicyclist can naturally produce.

    I'm tying speed to licensing-level, because crash-energy goes up with the square of the speed.

    Physically-weak? THEN small-motor.

    Linebacker? THEN huge-motor.

    Speeds are tied to licensing.

    I'm not tying speed to body-force, I'm tying it to licensing-level/competence-carefulness.

    Don't know how I fucked-up the communication so bad, but sorry.

    _ /\ _

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    Okay, but you're still talking like tying power to people's body energy output is a good thing. Speed, power, whatever, limiting our machine capability just because our body is limited (preventing working around disability) is an asshole move.

  • source
  • parent