▲ 220 ▼ Comprehensive Response to Bambu's AGPLv3 Violations (sfconservancy.org) submitted 5 months ago by LPThinker@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 17 comments fedilink hide all child comments The Software Freedom Conservancy taking some bold steps to push back against Bambu's blatant anti-consumerism via (amongst other tactics) violation of AGPLv3.
[–] towerful@programming.dev 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children) Pretty sure they wrote the AGPL licence Edit: They didn't permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] mschae@discuss.mschae23.de 23 points 5 months ago (2 children) The GPL licenses were all written by the free software foundation for the GNU project. But that doesn't make it less worthwhile to contribute to this cause, too :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LordMayor@piefed.social 9 points 5 months ago Written by a company, Funambol. Approved as open source by the Open Source Initiative. Published by the Free Software Foundation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Affero_General_Public_License# permalink fedilink source parent [–] towerful@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago Yeh, I realise now I misinterpreted an article I read permalink fedilink source parent [–] LordMayor@piefed.social 20 points 5 months ago (1 child) No, they’re a nonprofit that provides legal support to open source projects. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] towerful@programming.dev 5 points 5 months ago Ah, ok. I must've misinterpreted an article I was reading then. Thanks for the clarification! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mschae@discuss.mschae23.de 23 points 5 months ago (2 children) The GPL licenses were all written by the free software foundation for the GNU project. But that doesn't make it less worthwhile to contribute to this cause, too :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LordMayor@piefed.social 9 points 5 months ago Written by a company, Funambol. Approved as open source by the Open Source Initiative. Published by the Free Software Foundation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Affero_General_Public_License# permalink fedilink source parent [–] towerful@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago Yeh, I realise now I misinterpreted an article I read permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 9 points 5 months ago Written by a company, Funambol. Approved as open source by the Open Source Initiative. Published by the Free Software Foundation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Affero_General_Public_License# permalink fedilink source parent
[–] towerful@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago Yeh, I realise now I misinterpreted an article I read permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 20 points 5 months ago (1 child) No, they’re a nonprofit that provides legal support to open source projects. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] towerful@programming.dev 5 points 5 months ago Ah, ok. I must've misinterpreted an article I was reading then. Thanks for the clarification! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] towerful@programming.dev 5 points 5 months ago Ah, ok. I must've misinterpreted an article I was reading then. Thanks for the clarification! permalink fedilink source parent