Basically, the wild policy churn we see is designed to enable insider trading profits rather than benefit the country

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 6 months ago (11 children)

And what real world consequences does that result in? If it's nought then the word illegal is meaningless nonsense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (9 children)

    Any other judgment that doesn't involve laws that are not even worth the paper they're written on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (8 children)

    Such as?

    I can't think of a better institution than rule of law. The problem is all institutions rely on people to uphold them. Particularly, those in the positions of most power. Not just those with the guns.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (7 children)

    I can’t think of a better institution than rule of law

    That's really sad

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (5 children)

    Family, friendship, libraries, science idk i could go on all day lmao

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (4 children)

    You've forgotten the context of the question. Those institutions don't maintain social order. They are maintained by social order.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (3 children)

    Of course they do, how many billions of people wake up early in order to take care of their families every day? That's not social order?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    Social norms are why social order is possible sure. But how do you account for the uncooperative minority?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments