▲ 956 ▼ Bitwarden's new CEO has a Private Equity background, removed 'Inclusion' and 'Always Free' from their website -- because of course he did (www.fastcompany.com) submitted 5 months ago by german@pawb.social to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world 213 comments fedilink hide all child comments In the latest episode of "they will always sell you out" - they sold you out! Who would've thought. Hoping for a good alternative client to appear, the writing is on the wall. Vaultwarden can't exist without "leeching" off of Bitwarden.
[+] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago (2 children) It's not 'out of touch'. It's paying for (if it comes to that) a service that houses all of my business accounts, investment accounts, personal accounts, etc, and all with a pretty damn good track record. As with any technology, you must constantly evaluate it to see if what you are spending is justified for the service you are receiving. If at such time I feel the service isn't worth the price, then sure. As of now, it's not really an issue to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago It’s not acknowledging that part which seems out of touch. I assure you, I am fully cognizant of what for-profit corporations do. It's one of the reasons I turned off the TV over two decades ago. There just wasn't any ROI for me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] akwd169@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) Hmm nice profile pic permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago (2 children) It's not 'out of touch'. It's paying for (if it comes to that) a service that houses all of my business accounts, investment accounts, personal accounts, etc, and all with a pretty damn good track record. As with any technology, you must constantly evaluate it to see if what you are spending is justified for the service you are receiving. If at such time I feel the service isn't worth the price, then sure. As of now, it's not really an issue to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago It’s not acknowledging that part which seems out of touch. I assure you, I am fully cognizant of what for-profit corporations do. It's one of the reasons I turned off the TV over two decades ago. There just wasn't any ROI for me. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago It’s not acknowledging that part which seems out of touch. I assure you, I am fully cognizant of what for-profit corporations do. It's one of the reasons I turned off the TV over two decades ago. There just wasn't any ROI for me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago It’s not acknowledging that part which seems out of touch. I assure you, I am fully cognizant of what for-profit corporations do. It's one of the reasons I turned off the TV over two decades ago. There just wasn't any ROI for me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] akwd169@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) Hmm nice profile pic permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)