▲ 5 ▼ Is Michigan’s 10-cent bottle deposit worth it? (pca.st) submitted 6 months ago by dance_ninja@lemmy.world to c/michigan@midwest.social 3 comments fedilink hide all child comments Michigan Public's On Hand podcast episode discussing our bottle return system
[–] Nednarb44@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (2 children) TL;DL? permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world [S] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child) It has a great impact on reducing bottle/can pollution. There are opportunities to improve the system, including how we return the bottles and increasing the 50-year-old fee. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cravl@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 months ago Makes sense, those would be my two points as well. I would make the rate at least 40¢ and make it possible to return in bulk. The main issue would be dealing with invalid items. (E.g. unreadable labels, not accepted at that location, etc.) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world [S] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child) It has a great impact on reducing bottle/can pollution. There are opportunities to improve the system, including how we return the bottles and increasing the 50-year-old fee. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cravl@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 months ago Makes sense, those would be my two points as well. I would make the rate at least 40¢ and make it possible to return in bulk. The main issue would be dealing with invalid items. (E.g. unreadable labels, not accepted at that location, etc.) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cravl@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 months ago Makes sense, those would be my two points as well. I would make the rate at least 40¢ and make it possible to return in bulk. The main issue would be dealing with invalid items. (E.g. unreadable labels, not accepted at that location, etc.) permalink fedilink source parent