you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

While I mostly agree with you (and 100% on it distracting from the article), I think you’re not thinking about image rights.

If you’re a serious blogger with a good sized blog, a lawsuit or DMCA or otherwise is potentially a killer outcome of using an image you don’t 100% sure have the rights to. With AI, you can be 100% sure you can use the image however you want, without any repercussions. I’d imagine that’s huge in the considerations for a blogger.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Unsplash, Freepik, Pexels, and countless other sites exist where you can get free images with clear licensing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Any idea how well verified the images are on those sites? What's the chance that one with copyright gets uploaded and I get hit with a giant fine for using it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Dunno. I feel like if you've used an image from a reputable source under the proviso that you're licensed for it, and it turns out you're not... you may be able to blame Unsplash etc. and just swap the image out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    I dont think this is a reasomable counterpoint because the target audience in question would also vastly prefer shit as simple as an mspaint illustration or a dithered irl image.

    Also, it is quite feasible to find royalty free images, and I have no idea where you're getting the impression it is not. There are a host of images that provide licensing metadata. Google image search and co. can find these. It's simply a matter of verifying the license authenticity.

    It's just fundementally stupid.

  • source
  • parent