you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 6 months ago (4 children)

and in the 1700s "an good person" meant someone who didnt beat their slave

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (3 children)

    And it was still wrong. You'd think your all knowing god would know that if he's such a moral peraon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    This was in the BCs and it does not apply anymore

    "Moral" and "Good" standards change every year

    in 20 years, the best person you know could be absolute evil

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Motality standards do evolve - with human society. If your god was all-knowing and benevolent maybe he could have set that precedent early on instead of allowing slavery to continue literally to today.

    You're claiming your god decided "nah jk bro slavery isn't cool I was just joshing ya" at about the same time humanity did? What is he even good for? And why does he need you making excuses for him? Kick that bum to the curb. He's not worth your time, let alone your worship.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Was it ever good to own slaves? How could it be?

    Yet your god supposedly told his people that beating your slave is A-OK, even if they don't get up for a couple of days, as long as they don't die immediately.

  • source
  • parent