you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 6 months ago (4 children)

"in a proper democracy, power should be vested in lifetime appointments to the court that cannot be changed by later elections"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (3 children)

    It was sorta expected they would be highly qualified senior judges, so you have like 20 25 years, not grabbing law school grads that can sit for 50 years. I would support 20 year term, the point is that they should be less sensitive to politics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)

    they should be less sensitive to politics

    How's that working out in practice?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    Like everything else that relies on self restraint and toothless norms

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Exactly.

    There's a very good book, The Founders' Coup, that discusses exactly how much of the US Constitution was designed purposefully to remove democracy. And while that had one expression in the 18th century (rich land and slaveowners), in the 21st century it's just oligarchy when you remove democratic constraints.

  • source
  • parent