We've all seen the massive explosion in 3D-printed firearm development recently. Designs like the FGC-9 and Urutau are incredible feats of engineering. But this got me thinking: why don't we see the same level of innovation and high-quality projects for 3D-printed airguns?

Logically, it seems like airguns would be a much easier and more accessible path. Components like constant pressure valves, regulators, CO2 cartridges, and HPA (High-Pressure Air) tanks face far less regulation globally compared to live ammunition, primers, and barrels.

Given the current capabilities of 3D printing, shouldn't designing and building reliable CO2 or PCP platforms be easier? Is the core issue engineering-related (e.g., containing sustained high pressure in printed plastics vs. the momentary peak pressure of a 9mm cartridge)?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 4 points 6 months ago (5 children)

it is a pity of the closed of fosscad but the creainnovation is continuing, partisan9 and Modelo Polylactico just public the 3dp ammo is developing fast

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Modelo Polylactico isnt really practical and partisan9 was released a few years ago if i remember correctly

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 6 months ago (3 children)

    i think Modelo Polylactico is great because it hard to get bullet and case for me so the 3dp ammo is helpful,sr722 just released weeks ago

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah sr722 is cool i will build it someday definetly, for the 43r how did you solve the primers as those are my biggest bottlenecks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments