People Twitter

whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

10,586 readers

4,584 active

555 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician

https://www.sotwe.com/
https://twitterviewer.net/Note: Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.

If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

I think about this a lot. Even if a person "only" got 300 views, imagine those 300 people in front of you staring at you. (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 6 months ago by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

102 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

It's not supposesd to be agree/disagree, but thanks to a certain techbro who may or not be a robot, it is.

It was supposed to be "this does/not contribute something relevant to the conversation, and I may or not agree."

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 1 point 6 months ago

Any tech bro had nothing to do with this. It is what the community has decided as a whole that an upvote or a down vote means in the context of a conversation on the internet.v I was on Reddit for about 17 years pretty much since the beginning. And before that I was on dig and it's always how it's been used when it comes to the context of conversations.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent