552
Artemis astronaut shares video of Earth 🌍 setting on the Moon πŸŒ• (i.imgur.com)
submitted 6 months ago by to c/interestingasfuck@lemmy.world
49 comments fedilink hide all child comments
πŸš€ 4
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 6 months ago (15 children)

I πŸ§‘β€πŸ¦² am happy 😊 that you 🫡 put these emojis 😐, otherwise I πŸ§‘β€πŸ¦² wouldn't have understood 🀷

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    I still don't understand this use of emoji.

    It's not "I shoved a 🌡 up my πŸ†", I could get that, reject alphabet return to pictogram for the sake of compression if nothing else. But no, it's "I shoved a cactus 🌡 up my dick πŸ†" which is just...why are we doing this?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    It's only compressing the message visually (it generally uses more data)

    Also, at least for me, it takes more work to parse the images than words require. I have to like... shift out of reading mode, comprehend the image and then go back to reading.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    How do emoji use more data? They're one, maybe two unicode characters?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (5 children)

    And thus more data

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Than an entire word?

    Take "cactus" for example. Each letter in the word "cactus" is one unicode character, for a total of six. 🌡 is one unicode character, U+1F335.

    Unicode characters are 4 bytes long, so "cactus" takes 24 bytes to transmit, where "🌡" takes 4. Unless something something UTF_8?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago* (1 child)

    You're close, Unicode characters don't imply a number of bytes, it's how they're encoded that does (utf-8 most commonly). Utf-8 can be as little as one byte or as many as four, depending on the specific character. I don't know about emojis but I imagine they're in the four bytes section. Whereas "asdf" is also four bytes in utf-8.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    So I just looked it up, the UTF-8 encoding for the cactus emoji is 4 bytes long: 0xF0 0x9F 0x8C 0xB5

    Where the Latin alphabet is in the 1-byte region.

    So it takes 6 bytes to transmit "cactus" in UTF-8, and only 4 to transmit β€œπŸŒ΅β€. So any emoji that replaces 5 or more letters is more efficient. πŸ† breaks even with "dick" or "cock", more efficient than "penis", more than twice as compact as "eggplant" or "aubergine".

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    Emojis are great when you want to convey tone or emotion that you normally can't do through text alone. I find them especially useful when a sentence as-is sounds a lot colder than you actually mean it to be

    Obviously not the intention of OP and it's definitely excessive IMO but I do also find that they can be useful markers for longer texts. It gets a lot of hate but I find emojis really useful in codebase READMEs since you can quickly scan through and pick out the bits if information you're looking for

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Having grown up chatting with friends and hitting on chicks via MSN messenger, I'm aware. "I'm gonna get you for that 😑 " and "I'm gonna get you for that 😜 " are two different messages.

    I will allege that emoji are badly suited to that task though. First, there are too many emoji. Even just the facial expressions, there are dozens of them. Second, they aren't designed to parse to emotions, they're designed to parse to facial expressions. Many of which are specific to Japanese culture. Third, they're rendered kinda tiny in a lot of fonts. With a font size and screen zoom level set where I can comfortably read text, many emoji are just...yellow circles. Or little blobs of color that I have to bring the screen much closer to my face to make out than the raw text.

    Emoticons did the job better with less. But, entropy ruins all.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    πŸ‘‹ Are you a little bald headed baby ❓️

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Missed opportunity to use πŸ‘Ά

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    πŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ—Ώ

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •