you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 37 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (15 children)

Soon you'll have to pay for the privilege of communicating with a human instead of an LLM chat bot.

Edit: I realize I need to specify because I forgot to add relevant context.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    I don’t event want to talk to another human for free. Why would I pay for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago* (6 children)

    This comment actually doesn't make sense since there's always been a price to communicate outside of face to face (postage, telephone, ISP, etc.). I get the spirit of it, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    My bank recently switched all of its tellers with a row of ATMs inside the bank. I think this is kind of what they’re talking about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Switch to a credit union. If your bank is publicly traded then a portion of their profits are being syphoned away to rich douchbags, instead of services to customers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    My bank is strictly online and have never had to pay extra (for now) for any kind of extended service nor ever had to speak to a rep. I kinda like it that way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    I communicate way more face to face than in another way. So if I read communicating, I'm not thinking of calling, emailing, letterwriting or anything not face to face.

  • source
  • parent