? My stance on ADHD and amphetamine use isn't political. Unfortunately, the history of ADHD is personal to me. Shire released their first amphetamine product within a few months of Perdue's release of oxycontin. They used similar tactics to increase their userbase and bribed the same public officials.

...~10% of children in the united states either have taken or are taking amphetamine for a disease that didn't really exist prior to the release of Adderall. This doesn't seem fishy to you? Giving one of the most abusable psychoactives to a child is unlikely not to have an impact on their development.

The genius of an ADHD diagnosis is that it has a strong overlap with the side effects of long-term amphetamine use. It takes decades of research to prove harm, and even then it's tricky. Still, It's only a matter of time before it blows up into a Perdue level scandal. It's why Shire sold their patent; it's a liability issue.

I feel bad for the people dependent on amphetamine. Once the government cracks down on excessive and unethical prescriptions, a lot of people are in for a long withdrawal period. It took me a few years to learn how to function without it; I couldn't have done it willingly.