536
'Abhorrent' step-incest porn to be banned with up to five years in prison (metro.co.uk)
submitted 7 months ago by to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world
347 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 310 points 7 months ago (17 children)

When banging your step mum is legal but watching a fictional video of someone else banging their step mum is illegal 🤪 welcome to the UK ladies and gentlemen.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
    •
  • [–] 90 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    It's legal if you submit your ID to the government and have it recorded in the masterbaitorbase that you whacked off to that video. What, don't make it weird... /s

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 46 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    "Oi! Yew got a loicence fer that Stepmother? Roigt, oim gonna ave to clamp those jugs untill such toime as that courts decoide"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 23 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Well, it's not really different to supporting a genocidal fascist dictatorship and declaring everyone who supports their victims "terrorists"...

    The world is an idiocracy and the majority of humanity are mentally ill. The world would not be as fucking stupid and insane as it is if the average person was logical.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago*

    ...if the people weren't intentionally under-educated and manipulated en masse for generations to prefer illogical, irrational, and self-destructive patterns by their respective "government".

    FTFY.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    To be fair, the headline is overblown since they are banning step-incest porn where one of the individuals is pretending to be underage.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Which begs the question of "what do they mean by pretending to be underage?" I seriously doubt any of the actors are going to claim to be underage in the video as that would get their videos removed from any mainstream platform. Another user suggested that this is based on body type meaning petite actresses are going to be the ones targeted as being "illegal" just for existing as they are despite being of age.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    Yeah, it looks very vague and possible targeting videos that don't exist, have no effect and still give Starmer a political win?

    Starmer could use it but his reverse hand of midas is going to turn it to shit no matter who.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent