So I get ads are terrible, obviously. I run ad-blockers all the time. But people also get angry at paywalls. So that leaves me wondering, if not through ads or subscriptions, how is a news publisher supposed to sustain itself?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

Yeah, it should be tax funded and overseen by an independent oversight group.

I don't know why this is such a difficult thing. Access to information is necessary for a healthy society. Things that are necessary for a healthy society but aren't profitable should be tax funded, that's the purpose of the taxes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    The Finnish version of Yle is the only news publisher I follow and it is tax payer fumded and ad free. It's kind of a Finnish BBC. It's not unbiased but broadly speaking their journalism is of quite high quality. It's not of much use for people not from Finland but just an example that such thing can be done.

  • source
  • parent