you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 22 points 1 year ago (7 children)

What advantage does this software provide over simply banning bots via robots.txt?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 81 points 1 year ago

    Robots.txt expects that the client is respecting the rules, for instance, marking that they are a scraper.

    AI scrapers don't respect this trust, and thus robots.txt is meaningless.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago

    Well, now that y'all put it that way, I think it was pretty naive from me to think that these companies, whose business model is basically theft, would honour a lousy robots.txt file...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago

    TL;DR: You should have both due to the explicit breaking of the robots.txt contract by AI companies.

    AI generally doesn't obey robots.txt. That file is just notifying scrapers what they shouldn't scrape, but relies on good faith of the scrapers. Many AI companies have explicitly chosen not no to comply with robots.txt, thus breaking the contract, so this is a system that causes those scrapers that are not willing to comply to get stuck in a black hole of junk and waste their time. This is a countermeasure, but not a solution. It's just way less complex than other options that just block these connections, but then make you get pounded with retries. This way the scraper bot gets stuck for a while and doesn't waste as many of your resources blocking them over and over again.

  • source
  • parent