you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 30 points 7 months ago (9 children)

If you're going to jettison 90% of the plane to let it fall with parachutes, why not avoid all the complications of modularity and instead just have a parachute system that could let the entire plane float down? Or if the wings are the issue with floating down via parachute, just ditch those? Surely better than letting the pilots go down with the failing plane.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)

    Wings are strong as fuck. You don't want them detachable.

    As for why not parachute the whole thing: The wings are also where the fuel is, which can weigh a ton. And the engines weigh a ton. Much easier to design a parachute when you jettison those.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    Not just a ton, and I'm only chiming in here because the numbers are staggering. In the case of e.g. a 747 it's something like 190 tons. 63,000 some odd gallons of fuel.

    The fuel is also flammable, and the engines work by at the end of the day being on fire in a controlled manner. Having the fuel and engines hit the ground elsewhere from the occupants sounds like a good plan to me if you can manage a way to do it somehow.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I'd guess the issue is fire. Probably the only situation where this would be necessary.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    But like half of airline fires have been caused by things in the cargo hold.

    The cargo hold is typically under the passenger compartment.

    So in reality, there’s a 50ish percent chance that the pilots are just saving their own life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    If you ditch the fuselage even if the bottom of it on fire, it's most likely on its way to a dunking in seawater in a couple of minutes while the tens of thousands of gallons of fuel carry on elsewhere. On paper it's not a totally moronic idea, provided if and only if it can be carried out reliably somehow. (That's the part I'm doubtful about.)

  • source
  • parent