'Black Pearl solid silver conductors drawn in diamond coated dies and insulated with virgin FEP dielectric' doesn't help.

Audio Science Review - $4000 Audio Cable vs $7!!! on YT

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 38 points 7 months ago (10 children)

There's definitely a difference between properly made and shielded cables and the cheapo ones that can be unshielded. However once you meet certain standards like using the correct impedance coax there's basically no improvement from making the cables "better".

I've noticed that the few "Amazon basics" products I've tried were surprisingly good quality, they're probably just about at the right specification.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago (8 children)

    the analogy I always draw is to wine.

    the difference between a $5 bottle and a $20 is perceptible. but, the higher you go, the returns diminish exponentially unless you have a specific taste... and at some point paying the excessive amount of money becomes status not necessity.

    yes, potatoes are conductive, but they don't have any shielding and the distance the signal travels in those experiments is irrelevant to practical applications. it is essentially a big wire nut.

    if your application is long distances through conduit or many cables run in parallel you need higher quality ones with shielding. Granted, that is not the typical listener's case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    With wine, the price literally affects how we perceive the taste of the wine. https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/baba-shiv-how-wines-price-tag-affect-its-taste

    Although this research came out before the fMRI debacle...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    I remembered hearing about it. Turns out there was this published in 2016 which I'm pretty sure was the issue I heard about. https://www.vice.com/en/article/fmri-scanner-study-flawed-pnas-anders-eklund/

    As to whether anything more came of this I'm not sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    In this case scientific equipment determined no discernible difference in audio quality, though. I do actually believe in paying for nicer cables but up to a point and that's really mostly about build quality. $4000 for an RCA cable is just insanity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Apparently that point only needs to be $7.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    To be fair, the build quality is really what you'd be paying for with a nicer cable, though with an RCA cable that just stays plugged into your audio system all the time I guess that doesn't matter as much. I buy nice silicone USB charging cables for my phone because they'll last longer and are nicer to use, though the ones I like cost $12-$20, so not exactly $4k lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago*

    Not when there's load (like for speaker cables). Turns out shielding only matters for signal cables (which means analog ones unless your digital cable gets so long that it would have real signal loss)

    https://www.tomshardware.com/speakers/in-a-blind-test-audiophiles-couldnt-tell-the-difference-between-audio-signals-sent-through-copper-wire-a-banana-or-wet-mud-the-mud-should-sound-perfectly-awful-but-it-doesnt-notes-the-experiment-creator

  • source
  • parent