You've said delusion is always bad. But you've also set up your position so that nothing could ever count as evidence against it. if Coyote acts, he's real; if he doesn't, he just hasn't yet.

That's not the absence of delusion, that's the definition of an unfalsifiable belief.

I'm not asking you to abandon your practice. I'm asking: what would it take to convince you that you were wrong? If the answer is "nothing," then by your own standard, you're in moha.