128
Inside the Systemd Age Verification Debate: Developer Responds to Criticism (itsfoss.com)
submitted 7 months ago by to c/linux@programming.dev
63 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Dylan M. Taylor is not a household name in the Linux world. At least, he wasn’t until recently.

The software engineer and longtime open source contributor has quietly built a respectable track record over the years: writing Python code for the Arch Linux installer, maintaining packages for NixOS, and contributing CI/CD pipelines to various FOSS projects.

But a recent change he made to systemd has pushed him into the spotlight, along with a wave of intense debate.

At the center of the controversy is a seemingly simple addition Dylan made: an optional birthDate field in systemd’s user database.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -6 points 7 months ago (1 child)

Of course it does. Do you know how laws work?

Who broke the law if the owner is everyone?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago

    An open source software is, by law, the maintainer's (which can be an individual, or a group of persons) property. It is said maintainer who has the right to grant you any kind of license over what he owns.

    In the case of an open-source project, that license is very permissive, true, but if you take the time to read any of those, you will always see :

    • A provision indicating that the owners grants that licence within the limits of the applicable laws
    • Sometimes a provision indicating under which juridiction said license is granted. If not, the user local laws are the ones used.

    Source : the fucking law and the fucking licenses. And my friend, which happens to be a lawyer specialized in intellectual property laws.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent