▲ 457 ▼ Please don't delete the production DB (lemmy.zip) submitted 7 months ago by favoredponcho@lemmy.zip to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev 25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 21 points 7 months ago (3 children) Something like --dry-run there? permalink fedilink source hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 32 points 7 months ago (1 child) does dry running have any meaning on a function that is inherently stochastic? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago It can, if it's passed through to tools without the llm meddling, but the problem is that there is typically a tool for arbitrary shell commands, and unless there's a mechanism to dry run these, there's no way to handle it reliably. permalink fedilink source parent [–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago Are you sure you don't need the lube? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 32 points 7 months ago (1 child) does dry running have any meaning on a function that is inherently stochastic? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago It can, if it's passed through to tools without the llm meddling, but the problem is that there is typically a tool for arbitrary shell commands, and unless there's a mechanism to dry run these, there's no way to handle it reliably. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago It can, if it's passed through to tools without the llm meddling, but the problem is that there is typically a tool for arbitrary shell commands, and unless there's a mechanism to dry run these, there's no way to handle it reliably. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago Are you sure you don't need the lube? permalink fedilink source parent
