128
Inside the Systemd Age Verification Debate: Developer Responds to Criticism (itsfoss.com)
submitted 7 months ago by to c/linux@programming.dev
63 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Dylan M. Taylor is not a household name in the Linux world. At least, he wasn’t until recently.

The software engineer and longtime open source contributor has quietly built a respectable track record over the years: writing Python code for the Arch Linux installer, maintaining packages for NixOS, and contributing CI/CD pipelines to various FOSS projects.

But a recent change he made to systemd has pushed him into the spotlight, along with a wave of intense debate.

At the center of the controversy is a seemingly simple addition Dylan made: an optional birthDate field in systemd’s user database.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 7 months ago* (7 children)

I can't help but feel bad for Dylan. It's not like if he hadn't done this someone else wouldn't have had to eventually.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 23 points 7 months ago

    Why not wait until it becomes absolutely necessary and all other alternatives are exhausted? The mandatory age check thing hasn't been even accepted whole US wide let alone world-wide. He did not even wait for ut to play out. What is with the enthusiasm to jump on board with this?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago

    It's not like he had no way of thinking, "Geez, I don't have the experience or knowledge or insignts to start the ball rolling on such a major decision." and went on to do something useful instead.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent