I've never seen labeling like this before. Interesting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 7 months ago (8 children)

I hate to rain on a parade, but it's marketing bullshit. Aqua comes from water, isn't it? Purified one at that? "Vegetable"? Calcium fluoride is a source? "Natural ore" as opposed to an artificial lab grown ore?
It kinda looks nice unless you actually read it, or know what words mean. And if you do it's obvious ploy to capture very ignorant people.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 7 months ago

    I think you're reading it too pessimistically. There are so many people out there saying, "If you can't pronounce it or know where it's from, then it's straight POISON!"

    There are artificial ores. There are people who will want to know the water they used was clean (the purified water). This looks like a great way to educate people on what they're using and to learn not to be afraid of big, complicated words.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    You can find those things out. Natural ore means it comes from natural deposits (its not a lab-formulated compound).

    Some people prefer natural ingredients. Thats it.

    Otherwise its very common with synthetic or refined chemical ingredients in toothpaste, like:

    • Sodium fluoride / stannous fluoride (lab-produced, though based on natural elements)

    • Artificial abrasives (engineered silica)

    • Detergents like sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS)

    • Synthetic preservatives, flavors, or colorants

    Same reason people want to grow their own food. They know whats in it and what they put in their body.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    Sure, this is still a marketing strategy that could be exploited by bad corps, but it is a step in the right direction. This is where rules to define those terms accurately would be a good use of regulations.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    It kinda looks nice unless you actually read it, or know what words mean.

    Teaching children is pointless because it might look nice, but if you already know the stuff then you would recognize that it's all fairly trivial, well-known stuff. No reason to point it out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment