this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026

433 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

technology@lemmy.world

89,574 readers

13,839 active

2,408 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

moderators

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

Cyberattack on vehicle breathalyzer company leaves drivers stranded across the US (techcrunch.com)

submitted 7 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

88 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Interlock devices are the bare minimum if you insist on allowing people who have proven they will drive drunk to continue to drive.

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I was arguing with the point of "repeatedly" being a determining factor for having to have this device. It's not reality, once is enough.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Yes, once is enough. Repeatedly should get you banned from driving.

parent

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

When you consider that most people get away with a crime dozens of times at least before getting caught, then yes being caught once is enough.

parent