A jury has found Elon Musk liable for misleading investors by deliberately driving down Twitter's stock price in the tumultuous months leading up to his 2022 acquisition of the social media company for $44 billion. But it absolved him of some fraud allegations, finding that he did not "scheme" to mislead investors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 113 points 7 months ago (16 children)

Considering he’s made $400B since acquiring Twitter, this was just a minor cost of doing business.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 7 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I don't know, 0.5% isn't a bad rate...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Hmm, maybe in the US. It is a very strange place after all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    Where do you live where ATM rates are less than .5%?

    By the way, using an ATM from the same bank as your card doesn't count, because that's usually free.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    Considering he’s made $400B since acquiring Twitter...

    Serious question: How?

    AFAIK, Twitter wasn't terribly profitable before they sold to Musk. Then after he purchased it, the enshittification accelerated.

    How on earth does this result in $400 Billions in profit?!?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    He made $400B, not Twitter. That's almost entirely from Tesla and other ventures, not Twitter.

    Last I've been able to find Twitter was valued at $33B when xAI bought it. But that was clearly an overvalued sale. Just look at the valuation over time.

    And that's just raw valuation which is easily manipulated, not revenue or profit, which can be easily manipulated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    It's not real money, and Musk isn't the richest person in truth, not by a long shot. This is theoretical money based on overpriced companies that are propped up by what I suspect are some rather shady practices and investors using it as a casino stock.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    And there is almost zero chance he actually pays this. If anything, it will be a fraction of the amount in 20 years after he exhausts appeals and pushes deadlines to the max.

  • source
  • parent