The optional birthDate field gives other projects a standardized data source for age verification compliance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 7 months ago (6 children)

its age attestation, not age verification (saying it vs proving it). also, dont give systemd shit about this bc they are just covering their asses in case more restrictive laws go through.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago*

    They're not even really covering their asses. They don't make an OS, they make a small but important art of many distros. They're providing a clean, standardized way for Linux distros from RedHat to Ageless to comply with the law if they choose to. Some distros will comply with the law to the letter, others will not comply out of spite. At least the ones that comply will do it in a standard way.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I am kinda giving them shit for when someone pointed out that they're essentially storing PII completely unsecured and their response was "you should use app isolation anyway". That is not a good security model.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    no, they are bending to the knee. you dont say “let’s compromise with the nazis.” you say “let’s barbecue nazis in their own ovens. dave has a fucking great nazi sauce…”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment