A US F-35 fighter jet made an emergency landing at US air base in the Middle East after it was struck by what is believed to be Iranian fire, according to two sources familiar with the matter.

Capt. Tim Hawkins, a spokesperson for US Central Command, said the fifth-generation stealth jet was “flying a combat mission over Iran” when it was forced to make an emergency landing. Hawkins said the aircraft landed safely and the incident is under investigation.

The incident would be the first time Iran has hit a US aircraft in the war started in late February. Both the US and Israel are flying F-35s in the conflict; the aircraft costs upwards of $100 million.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 7 months ago (13 children)

Wait, but I thought these things are invisible...

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago* (4 children)

    For the all the probably hundreds of sorties flown with a result of zero losses and only a single aircraft being damaged they might aswell be invisible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    What's the US version of tankies?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)

    Wankies, and they're out in force.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago*

    You don't have to be a tankie or a wankie to recognize the fact that a loss ratio of 0% is very good for an aircraft.

    If it was a Russian or Chinese aircraft doing this then that would also be a fact.

    It's stupid to say that a single aircraft being damaged makes the entire type worthless like many here are saying when the F-35 is the only aircraft flying these missions and come back with only damage to a single plane.

    That is not a political statement or approval of the strikes. That's just a statement on the plane.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago* (4 children)

    Stealth is not invisibility, it's a combination of technologies that make planes hard to detect by sensors such as radar.

    The video the Iranians released showed an F-35 that was within visual range of an anti-air asset before being hit.

    No confirmation if that video is legitimate. We'll just have to wait for more information.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Trump literally thought they were invisible during a meeting in his first term.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    No confirmation if that video is legitimate. We'll just have to wait for more information.

    Centcom doesn't seem to be denying it. Tho the video I've seen going around has an abrupt cut when the plane was hit. So likely it was hit but not taken down.

  • source
  • parent
  • They can also be flying with extra munitions under the wings. At which point they stop being stealthy.

    Also stealth aircraft are notoriously difficult and sensitive on maintenance. So might be a case of stealth degrading after a few weeks of intense operation.

    And the theory I see floating around on forums is that it was a QAEM-118 missile. Since it has IR and optical guidance that could ignore sheath at shorter ranges/low speed. And some US missions might be flying at low altitude to make use of terrain masking.

  • source
  • parent